USPTO serial 79443159
MOTTA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KOLODNER, LOUIS FRANCIS
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 122
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MOTTA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Retailing, including via self-service, of foodstuffs and beverages; business consultancy relating to the management of restaurants, pizzerias, bars and ice cream parlours; online ordering services in the field of restaurant take-out and delivery; business services relating to providing sponsorship; organisation, implementation and supervision of loyalty and incentive schemes. | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | Restaurants including self-service restaurants; services of tearooms; bar services; café services, pizzeria services, ice cream parlour services; preparation of food and beverages for immediate consumption; takeaway restaurant services; take-away fast food services; providing food and drink in retail and take-away establishments; food and drink catering. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 13, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 16, 2026 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 31, 2026 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 31, 2026 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 19, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2026 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 2, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 17, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2026 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |