USPTO serial 79443242
SUPAFUSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 661
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTYNOV,VIKTORIIA V
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 133
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SUPAFUSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kenneth F. Florek
Kenneth F. Florek FLOREK & ENDRES PLLC77 Main Street, Suite 104Tappan, NY 10983United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Mediation and conclusion of commercial transactions for other for the purpose of promoting the presence of companies in video games and facilitating the conclusion of partnerships; advertising; arrangement of advertising services; market study services; compilation and analysis of business data; advisory services regarding business deployment strategy for brands; advertising, promotional and public relations services; services introducing commercial and professional contacts, namely, business networking; commercial management services connected with the compilation and analysis of information and data; advisory services relating to business marketing; promotion, advertising services and marketing of third-party online websites; targeted advertising and new targeted marketing services; promoting and marketing the goods and services of third parties, via email and text messaging; customer data management services, namely, database management services; customer relationship management services; optimization of online websites for third parties; optimization of search engines and websites; dissemination of advertisements for third parties via the Internet; online advertising services for third parties on computer networks; negotiations and conclusion of commercial transactions for others; business administration of consumer loyalty campaigns; influencer marketing services; production of video recordings for advertising purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Services for design and development of graphic interfaces and digital content for online video games; graphic arts design and web site design services in the nature of conception for the creation of websites and for the creation of immersive experiences on video game platforms; software design and development services; business consulting and business project management services for video game developers; providing temporary use of non-downloadable software for editing, modifying, compiling, storing and sharing video sequences; computer system analysis; computer system design; Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for managing, measuring and analyzing advertising campaigns and brand partnerships in video games; software design services for design and improvement of digital interfaces to optimize user experience | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 16, 2026 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 28, 2026 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 28, 2026 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 27, 2026 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 26, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 15, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2026 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |