USPTO serial 79443312
QLIQUID
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARR, PATRICK C
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 125
What this means
Status 680 means the examining attorney approved your mark for publication in the USPTO Official Gazette. Publication for opposition usually follows within weeks, opening a 30-day window for third parties to oppose. Watch for publication (status 686) and monitor the 30-day opposition window.
Need help with QLIQUID?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel C. Neustadt
Daniel C. Neustadt Holland & Knight LLP800 17th Street NW, Suite 1100Washington, DC 20006United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemical additives for use in industry; chemical additives for use in industry for antibacterial, antiviral, and antifungal purposes; chemical additives for use in the manufacture of cosmetics; active chemical ingredients for use in the manufacture of cosmetics; antibacterial chemical additives for use in the manufacture of paints; antibacterial chemical additives for use in the manufacture of packaging materials; antibacterial chemical additives for coating of pipes; antibacterial chemical additives for use in the manufacture of plastics, rubber and silicone; antibacterial chemical additives for use in the manufacture of surface coatings; antibacterial chemical additives for use in the manufacture of fabric and textile coatings; antibacterial chemical additives for use in the manufacture of coatings of penetrating medical devices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 6, 2026 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 6, 2026 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2026 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2026 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2026 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 7, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 7, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 1, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 1, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 16, 2026 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 31, 2026 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 31, 2026 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 3, 2026 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 2, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 15, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2026 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |