USPTO serial 79443608
MC MIRACLE COAT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 641Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLAZICH, JOAN MICHELE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 122
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with MC MIRACLE COAT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAE Y PARK
JAE Y PARK Kile Park Reed & Houtteman PLLC12011 Route 50Suite 300Fairfax, VA 22033Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | Paint protection films of polymeric polyurethane, for vehicles; protection plastic films for vehicle interiors or exteriors; paint protection films of polyurethane for vehicles; protective plastic films for use on vehicle interiors or exteriors; flexible polyurethane films for protecting vehicle paint; plastic film for protecting vehicle paint; sheets of adhesive plastic film for protecting vehicles; clear polymeric plastic film for protecting vehicles, other than for packaging; paint protection films made of thermoplastic polyurethane for vehicle bodies; paint protection films of polyurethane, other than for packaging | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Wholesale store services featuring paint protection film for vehicles; retail store services featuring paint protection film for vehicles; arranging of contracts for the purchase and sale of paint protection film for vehicles, for others; online retail store services featuring automobile parts and components; wholesale store services featuring protection plastic films for use in vehicle interiors or exteriors; retail store services featuring protection plastic films for use in vehicle interiors or exteriors; arranging of contracts for the purchase and sale of protection plastic films for use in vehicle interiors or exteriors, for others; wholesale store services featuring plastic films for protecting vehicle exteriors; retail store services featuring plastic films for protecting vehicle exteriors; arranging of contracts for the purchase and sale of plastic films for protecting vehicle exteriors, for others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 2026 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 23, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 30, 2026 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 16, 2026 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 16, 2026 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 9, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2026 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 9, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 15, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2026 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |