Drawing for EPISNOW

USPTO serial 79443640

EPISNOW

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 681
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EPISNOW?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Claudia W. Stangle

Claudia W. Stangle Leydig, Voit & Mayer, Ltd.180 N. Stetson AveSuite 4900Chicago, IL 60601

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Active chemical and biological agents for manufacturing cosmetic preparations as well as body and beauty care products; Chemical substances for the manufacture of pharmaceutical and cosmetic products, as well as for scientific purposes; chemical preparations for use in industryACTIVE—
003Non-medicated toiletry preparations and cosmetic preparationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 7, 2026OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 7, 2026OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 25, 2026CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 2, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 2, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 2, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 30, 2026CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
May 14, 2026RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 26, 2026RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 26, 2026RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 14, 2026RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 13, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 6, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 15, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 15, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 12, 2026REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance