USPTO serial 79443668
QRKY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 645Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LIU, PHILIP
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with QRKY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Carlos P Garritano
Carlos P Garritano Tucker Ellis LLP950 Main AvenueSuite 1100Cleveland, OH 44113Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Design and development of web-based software for creating two dimensional computer codes in the nature of QR codes and bar codes incorporating images, videos, animations and multimedia entertainment content; software as a service (SaaS) featuring non-downloadable software for generating and scanning two dimensional computer codes in the nature of QR codes and bar codes; providing online non-downloadable software for creating personalized two dimensional images, videos, animations and multimedia entertainment content in the nature of QR codes and bar codes in the fields of payment, advertising, marketing, visual communication, identity solutions; design and development of software enabling mobile devices in the nature of cell phone, tablets, laptops scanners, handheld point of sale terminals, printers and marking devices in the nature of cell phone, tablets, laptops, scanners, handheld point of sale terminals to process and interpret two dimensional computer codes in the nature of QR codes and bar codes; programming of computer software for generating, customizing and scanning two- dimensional computer codes in the nature of QR codes and bar codes over networks and mobile applications | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 25, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 25, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 24, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 9, 2026 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 25, 2026 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 25, 2026 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 18, 2026 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 17, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 16, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2026 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |