USPTO serial 79443897
ZIYULI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 645Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHANOSKI, JOANNA MARIE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 130
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with ZIYULI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dana Stewart-Mekdara
Dana Stewart-Mekdara Global Trademarks, Inc.505 S. Villa Real Drive, Suite 102Anaheim Hills, CA 92807United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Video game machines; swimming pool racing lanes; trading card games; toy cars; jigsaw puzzles; skis; playing cards; plush toys; bowling balls; toy water pistols; dominoes; flying discs; kites; apparatus for games, namely, dolls; toy models; toy models, namely, dolls; board games; balls for games; body-training apparatus; archery implements; skateboards; play swimming pools; boxing gloves; Christmas trees of synthetic material; stationary exercise bicycles; air glider exercise machines; doll helmets; roller skates; in-line skates; smart plush toys; play balloons; swings | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 23, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 21, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 16, 2026 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 9, 2026 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 26, 2026 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 26, 2026 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 24, 2026 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 23, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 22, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 19, 2026 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |