USPTO serial 79444229
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KENICHI SHIBATA
KENICHI SHIBATA Apex Juris pllc100 2nd Avenue South Ste 290Edmonds, WA 98020United States| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Battery anti-sulphurizing agents; liquid industrial chemicals for removing sulfates from batteries; agents for improving battery performance, namely, battery anti-sulphurizing agents, battery electrolytes, salts for galvanic batteries, chemical additives for battery electrolytes, anti-frothing solutions for batteries, and acidulated water for recharging batteries; high performance unprocessed polymer resins | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Devices for preventing capacity degradation of storage batteries; battery terminals; batteries and parts and accessories, namely, battery testers, battery cables, battery terminal connector clamps, battery connectors, battery voltage indicators, battery cases, and battery boxes; battery chargers. | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 16, 2026 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 29, 2026 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 29, 2026 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 8, 2026 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 7, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 20, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 19, 2026 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |