USPTO serial 79444601
BAKEHOUSE BEST OF BAKERY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 661
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CREEF, DAVIS W
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 125
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BAKEHOUSE BEST OF BAKERY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Walter W. Richardson
Walter W. Richardson WC&F IP11491 Sunset Hills RoadSuite 340Reston, VA 20190Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Pasta; bakery goods; Confectionary made of sugar, iced confectionary, jelly confectionary; chocolate confectionary, chocolate coated confectionary | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Retail store services featuring food, pasta, bakery goods, and confectionery; wholesale store services featuring food, pasta, bakery goods, and confectionery; Retail on-line ordering services featuring food, pasta, bakery goods, and confectionery, also accesible by telephone, facsimile and mail order; On-line wholesale store services featuring featuring food, pasta, bakery goods, and confectionery | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 16, 2026 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 1, 2026 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 1, 2026 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 22, 2026 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 22, 2026 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2026 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2026 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2026 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 11, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 26, 2026 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |