Drawing for AI Q-SYMPHONY

USPTO serial 79444798

AI Q-SYMPHONY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 681
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCDORMAN, ROGER THOMAS
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AI Q-SYMPHONY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Daniel I. Schloss

Daniel I. Schloss Greenberg Traurig, LLPOne Vanderbilt AvenueNew York, NY 10017United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Televisions; soundbar speakers; audio speakers; downloadable computer software for controlling the operation of televisions, soundbar speakers, and audio speakers; recorded computer software for controlling the operation of televisions, soundbar speakers, and audio speakers.ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 14, 2026NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 23, 2026CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 22, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 21, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 21, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 30, 2026RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 10, 2026RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 10, 2026RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 9, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 5, 2026RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 4, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 28, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 27, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 27, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 26, 2026REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance