Drawing for SILENTCLOUD

USPTO serial 79444860

SILENTCLOUD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 641Office Action
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MARTYNOV,VIKTORIIA V
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 133

What this means

The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.

Status 641: Status 641 means the USPTO mailed a non-final Office Action identifying issues with your application. You typically have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Need help with SILENTCLOUD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sherri Eastley

Sherri Eastley Pirkey Barber PLLC1801 East 6th Street, Suite 300Austin, TX 78702United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable software in the nature of a mobile application for use in providing sound therapies, behavioral therapy, hearing assessments, tinnitus and hearing education, tinnitus management tools, and related support for those with tinnitus; downloadable mobile applications for tinnitus therapy, tinnitus management, tinnitus patient support, and tinnitus and hearing education; downloadable software in the nature of a mobile application for use in tinnitus management, therapy and support; downloadable software in the nature of a mobile application for supporting tinnitus patientsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 20, 2026RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 22, 2026RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 22, 2026RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 4, 2026RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 3, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 28, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 22, 2026ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 22, 2026REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 22, 2026CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Apr 22, 2026COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Mar 20, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 20, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 19, 2026LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Feb 26, 2026SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance