Drawing for PRESTIGE PRO

USPTO serial 79445072

PRESTIGE PRO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 692
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STRUCK, ROBERT J
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PRESTIGE PRO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeremy D. Bisdorf

Jeremy D. Bisdorf Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP27777 Franklin Rd., Ste. 2500Southfield, MI 48034United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008Hand-operated die cutting tools; hand-operated tools for cutting paper, card, and similar craft materialsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 13, 2026PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Sep 30, 2026OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 30, 2026OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 18, 2026CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 12, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 12, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 12, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 20, 2026RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 31, 2026RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 31, 2026RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 9, 2026RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 8, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 27, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 22, 2026ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS—
Apr 22, 2026ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 22, 2026REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 22, 2026CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Apr 22, 2026COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Mar 5, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 5, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 5, 2026REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance