USPTO serial 79445216
Serial No. 79445216
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 661
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SUK, HAE P
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 79445216?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Matthew Dresden
Matthew Dresden Dresden Law PLLC2400 NW 80th St., Suite 211Seattle, WA 98117United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Electric pasta making machines; electric steamed bun making machine; electric dumpling making machine; electromechanical machines for food preparation in the nature of machines for mincing, dicing, slicing, and chopping food; juice extractors, electric; mixing machines; electric food agitators; mixer machines, namely, electric mixers for household purposes; mixer machines, namely, mixing machines; food processors, electric; vending machines | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 10, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 14, 2026 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 27, 2026 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 27, 2026 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 2, 2026 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 13, 2026 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 12, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 5, 2026 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |