USPTO serial 79445224
KATCHA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 661
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ANDERSON, DANIELLE LYNN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KATCHA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Connor W. Oswalt
Connor W. Oswalt IpHorgan Ltd.195 Arlington Heights Road, Suite #125Buffalo Grove, IL 60089United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Medical devices for use in treating vascular occlusive disease; surgical devices; medical implants composed of artificial material; surgical implants composed of artificial material; medical stents; stents for surgical purposes; medical and surgical devices for performing thrombectomy procedures; balloons for medical and surgical purposes; vascular stents and medical balloons; angioplasty balloon catheters; inflation devices for balloon catheters; cardiovascular catheters; balloon catheters; medical introducers for placing stents in the body; prosthetic tissues for vascular use; artificial vascular grafts; cardiac vascular prosthesis for surgical protheses; angiographic vascular sheath introducers for the placement of catheters; suture materials; intravascular implants made from artificial materials; scoring balloons for medical and surgical purposes; structural parts for the aforesaid goods | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 10, 2026 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 10, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 2026 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 13, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 13, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 2, 2026 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 2, 2026 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 13, 2026 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 12, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 6, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 5, 2026 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |