USPTO serial 79445250
BIOCALCIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 641Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BILLINGS, JOHN T
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with BIOCALCIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cathleen E. Stadecker
Cathleen E. Stadecker Downs Rachlin Martin PLLC199 Main Street, PO Box 190Burlington, VT 05402United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | Liquid or semi-liquid construction materials for injection into the ground; construction materials, not of metal, for injection into the ground for strengthening or reinforcing purposes; construction materials, not of metal, for ground reinforcement. | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Construction; injection of products into the ground, particularly for strengthening or reinforcing purposes; construction consultation. | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Engineering; engineering consulting and technical support for carrying out injections of products into the ground for strengthening or reinforcing purposes. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2026 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 22, 2026 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 22, 2026 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 4, 2026 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 3, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 21, 2026 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Apr 21, 2026 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 21, 2026 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2026 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 21, 2026 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 5, 2026 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |