Drawing for POWERFLOW

USPTO serial 79445384

POWERFLOW

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 661
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MANGUBAT, ALEXANDER GEORGE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 121

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with POWERFLOW?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jennifer A. Van Kirk

Jennifer A. Van Kirk Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP201 East Washington Street, Suite 1200Phoenix, AZ 85004United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable software for control of electric arc furnaces, electrical loads and industrial loads; computers; electric transformers; electric converters; Electronic instruments for monitoring electric current and electrical signals, namely, electronic monitors and electric sensors for tracking and monitoring voltage, current and temperature of electric arc furnaces, electric loads, and industrial power loads; Electrical control instruments, namely, electronic controllers, programmable logic controllers (PLCs), and electronic control devices for regulating electrical loads and managing power distribution to electric arc furnaces and industrial power loadsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 21, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 21, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 21, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 3, 2026RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 17, 2026RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 12, 2026RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 11, 2026RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 10, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 2, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 28, 2026CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 12, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 12, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 12, 2026REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance