Drawing for SENTEK WI-FI LINK

USPTO serial 79445712

SENTEK WI-FI LINK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 681
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MAIHOS, JESSIE ANDREA
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SENTEK WI-FI LINK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Alexis P. Grilli

Alexis P. Grilli Nixon Peabody LLP799 9th Street, NW, Suite 500Washington, DC 20001United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Telecommunications and data networking hardware, namely, devices for the transmission of soil moisture and soil salinity information between soil moisture and soil salinity probes, measurement and logging equipment, and digital communication and telemetry equipment; wireless communication devices for transmitting and receiving soil moisture and soil salinity information; wireless communication devices for communicating soil moisture and soil salinity information using wireless and cable mediums; computer hardware, namely, communication equipment being telemetry modules and interfaces operatively connected to soil moisture and soil salinity probes, measurement and logging equipment; downloadable communications software for configuring and managing networks, routing, visualising and analysing soil moisture and soil salinity information in irrigation management and environmental monitoring; blank electronic data storage media for the storage of soil measurement datasets; electronic data loggers configured to record soil moisture and soil salinity measurements; electronic data recorders for recording soil moisture and soil salinity datasets; data transmission apparatus for transferring soil measurement information using wireless and cable mediums; computer networking hardware for use with data transmission networks limited to remote network interconnections for soil measurement systems; downloadable software for data analysis limited to interpreting soil moisture and soil salinity measurements to inform irrigation scheduling and environmental assessment; electronic data recorders, namely, digital data recording media for archiving soil measurement information; digital data processing apparatus for processing and analysing soil moisture and soil salinity information, all solely and specifically adapted for use in the field of commercial and scientific agronomy and environmental science and in connection with soil moisture and soil salinity measurement, communication and analysis systemsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 14, 2026NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 22, 2026CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 3, 2026RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 27, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 27, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 27, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 17, 2026RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 17, 2026RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 15, 2026RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 14, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 1, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 15, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 15, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 12, 2026REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance