Drawing for FRITES ATELIER

USPTO serial 79445749

FRITES ATELIER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 661
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CAYCEDO, CATHERINE ANN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FRITES ATELIER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Timothy Dell Nichols

Timothy Dell Nichols WORKMAN NYDEGGER60 East South Temple, Suite 1000Suite 1000Salt Lake City, UT 84111

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Meat croquettes; fish croquettes; chicken croquettes; lamb croquettes; potato products, namely potato chips, french fries, potato fries, potato crisps and potato sticks, frozen french fries and frozen potato fries; fried potatoes; baked potatoes; french fried potatoes; potato-based snackfoods; meat-based snack foods; fish-based snack foodsACTIVE—
030Tomato ketchup; mayonnaise; savory sauces used as condiments; mustard.ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 15, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 15, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 15, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 11, 2026RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 24, 2026RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 24, 2026RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 10, 2026RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 9, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 25, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 24, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 24, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 23, 2026LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Mar 12, 2026REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance