USPTO serial 79446187
BTL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 645Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with BTL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ryan D Artis
Ryan D Artis Riverside Law LLP175 Strafford AveSuite 100Wayne, PA 19087Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 004 | Electrical energy; hydrogen fuel; fuels derived from renewable sources; alternative fuels; hydrogen for use in fuel cells | ACTIVE | — |
| 007 | Generators of electricity; machines for hydrogen production by electrolysis; industrial electrolysers for hydrogen production; machines for generating power, namely, hydrogen electric power generators; Hydrogen dispensing pumps for service stations; Turbines, other than for land vehicles; machine parts, namely hydrogen storage tanks; machines for the production, compression and pumping of hydrogen; machines for the production of renewable electricity; Hydrogen-powered electricity generator; apparatus for the conversion of energy from hydrogen to electrical energy in the nature of hydrogen fuel cells; compressing machines; Pumps for machines; Electric pumps | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Apparatus and instruments for accumulating and storing electricity produced from hydrogen; batteries, electric; fuel cells; accumulators, electric; controllers of electric power from hydrogen sources; electronic control units for hydrogen energy systems; measuring instruments for the monitoring of hydrogen production and consumption; instruments and sensors for the monitoring of hydrogen pressure and temperature; electronic fuel cell control units; hydrogen fuel cell energy storage apparatus in the nature of supercapacitors for energy storage; hydrogen sensors, not for medical use; hydrogen detectors, not for medical use; apparatus for the transformation and control of energy, namely electric power controllers for hydrogen energy systems; downloadable software for managing the distribution and storage of hydrogen energy; recorded software for managing the distribution and storage of hydrogen energy | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 17, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 18, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 25, 2026 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 5, 2026 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 5, 2026 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 21, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2026 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 23, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 24, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2026 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2026 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |