USPTO serial 79446236
ONEDRY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 661
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BALSTAD, ELIZABETH M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 138
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ONEDRY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Justin Brown
Justin Brown Brown Brothers Law LLP1827 harley driveann arbor, MI 48103United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | high rain clogs (ashida); motorcycle rain suits; physical trainers being shoes authenticated by non-fungible tokens (NFTs); physical training shoes authenticated by non-fungible tokens (NFTs); rain boots; rain boots for children; rain capes; raincoats; rain coats; raincoats being jackets; rain footwear; rain hats; rain jackets; rain pants; rain ponchos; rainproof clothing, namely, rainproof jackets; rainproof jackets; rain shoes; rain slickers; rain slickers being clothing; rain suits; rain trousers; rainwear; trainers being sneakers; trainers being sneakers authenticated by non-fungible tokens (NFTs); trainers being footwear; trainers being sports shoes; training shoes; training shoes, authenticated by non-fungible tokens (NFTs); training shoes authenticated by non-fungible tokens (NFTs); training shoes being footwear; training shoes being sports shoes; training suits | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 30, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 29, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 25, 2026 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 9, 2026 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 8, 2026 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 25, 2026 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 24, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 20, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2026 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |