Drawing for FORPI

USPTO serial 79446294

FORPI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 661
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FORPI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John Strand

John Strand Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.600 Atlantic AvenueBoston, MA 02210United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Surgical navigation systems comprising optical tracking cameras and optical tracking markers; surgical apparatus and instruments used for surgical navigation and image-guided surgery; markers for use in image-guided surgery in the nature of optical tracking markers; surgical navigation markers in the nature of optical tracking markers; fiducial markers in the nature of optical tracking markers; devices for tracking the position of patients and instruments during surgery; surgical cameras; optical tracking devices, namely, optical tracking cameras; optical motion measurement devices for use in computer assisted surgeryACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 5, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 5, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 5, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 23, 2026RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 9, 2026RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 9, 2026RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 22, 2026RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 21, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 12, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 25, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 23, 2026LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Mar 19, 2026REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance