USPTO serial 79446380
WEEDSNIPER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 641Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAUNDERS, CAROLINE M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 134
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with WEEDSNIPER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph A. Sebolt
Joseph A. Sebolt Sand, Sebolt & Wernow Co., LPA4940 Munson Street NWCanton, OH 44718United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Weeding machines; agricultural machines, namely, implements for injecting a substance into a plant or animal, being a weedicide, insecticide, fertiliser, trace element, nutrient, inoculant, herbicide, fungicide, growth regulator, genetic material, hormone or pheromone; cutting machines | ACTIVE | — |
| 008 | Gardening tools, namely, implements for injecting a substance into a plant, being a weedicide, insecticide, fertiliser, trace element, nutrient, inoculant, herbicide, fungicide, growth regulator, genetic material, hormone or pheromone; hand tools, namely, weed cutters; hand tools, namely, punches; hand-operated cutting tools | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2026 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Sep 23, 2026 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 23, 2026 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2026 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2026 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2026 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 27, 2026 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 27, 2026 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 19, 2026 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 18, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 23, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2026 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2026 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |