USPTO serial 79446405
AIRCRISP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STANWOOD, STEPHEN D
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AIRCRISP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
BUTTERWORTH, PULAU PINANG, MY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian Edward Banner
Brian Edward Banner The Banner Firm, LLC1201 Patrick StreetFredericksburg, VA 22401United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Frozen appetizers consisting primarily of seafood; frozen meals consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables; frozen pre-packaged entrees consisting primarily of seafood; frozen pre-packaged main courses consisting primarily of seafood; frozen seafood, namely, prawns; frozen fish; frozen seafood; frozen pre-cooked fish; pre-packaged dinners consisting primarily of seafood; prepared main courses consisting primarily of seafood; prepared meals consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables; processed seafood; processed seafood products; tempura seafood; chilled foods consisting predominantly of processed fish; meat; fish, not live; poultry; game; packaged meals consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables; preserved, frozen, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; prepared meals consisting primarily of vegetables, root vegetables, or uncooked vegetables; preserved fruits and vegetables; processed edible root vegetables; processed fruits; processed vegetables; processed mushrooms; formed textured vegetable protein for use as a meat substitute; freeze-dried vegetables; quick frozen vegetables; vegetable chips; vegetable crisps being vegetable chips; vegetable-based meat substitutes; vegetable-based snack foods | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 13, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 2026 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 9, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 9, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 9, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 11, 2026 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 4, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2026 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 21, 2026 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 4, 2026 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 3, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 20, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2026 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |