USPTO serial 79446540
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marek Krizka, Esq.
Marek Krizka, Esq. TRAMA LEGAL, PLLC1178 BROADWAY, FL 3New York, NY 10001United States| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Robotic exoskeleton suits, being machines, other than for medical purposes; stators, being parts of machines; machine parts, namely, air cylinders; shock absorber plungers for machines; mineworking machines; conveyors being machines; hand-held hydraulic tools, namely, battery actuated hydraulic crimp tool; machines for manufacturing semiconductors for use in the electronics industry; industrial robots; lifting machines for containers. | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 2026 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 30, 2026 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 30, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 30, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 29, 2026 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 29, 2026 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2026 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2026 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2026 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 19, 2026 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 19, 2026 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 31, 2026 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 30, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 27, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2026 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |