Drawing for DERM-PHY

USPTO serial 79446554

DERM-PHY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 681
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DERM-PHY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Caitlin R. Byczko

Caitlin R. Byczko Barnes & Thornburg LLP11 South Meridian StreetIndianapolis, IN 46204United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003cosmetics for use on the body and face; cosmetic washing creams; cosmetic washing oils; superfatted soap bar; cosmetic scrubbing creams; make-up removing milk; make-up removing jelly; cosmetic scrubbing jelly; cosmetic micellar waters; cosmetic cleansing water foam; body deodorantsACTIVE—
005dermatological preparations for the body and for the face; pharmaceutical products for face and body care and hygiene, namely, dermatological preparations for skin care and dermatological preparations being facial and body cleansersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 23, 2026CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 22, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 22, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 22, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 30, 2026CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jul 2, 2026RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 9, 2026RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 8, 2026RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 25, 2026RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 24, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 23, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 27, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 27, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 26, 2026REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance