Drawing for HDAX HIGH DEFINITION AXMINSTER

USPTO serial 79446702

HDAX HIGH DEFINITION AXMINSTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 661
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KAPLAN, VALERIE ELIZABETH
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HDAX HIGH DEFINITION AXMINSTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bridget Hoy

Bridget Hoy Lewis Rice LLC600 Washington Ave, Suite 2500St. Louis, MO 63101United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
027Underlay for rugs; underlay for carpets, carpeting, floor mats, floor matting, rugs, linoleum floor coverings; backing for carpets, carpeting, floor mats, floor matting, rugs, linoleum floor coverings; carpets; carpeting; mats being floor coverings; parts and fittings for the aforesaid goods.ACTIVE—
042Providing non-downloadable software for viewing digital images and photographs for designing carpets, rugs, and floor mats; providing information and consultancy services for the aforesaid services.ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 9, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 9, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 9, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 27, 2026RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 12, 2026RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 12, 2026RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 11, 2026RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 10, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 2, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 7, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 29, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 29, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 26, 2026REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance