Drawing for OPTISET

USPTO serial 79447198

OPTISET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 681
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
OSGOOD, KRYSTINA E
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OPTISET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David L. Oppenhuizen

David L. Oppenhuizen Oppenhuizen Law PLC625 Kenmoor Ave. SESte. 301Grand Rapids, MI 49546

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Gelatine for use in manufacturing gummy candies and gummy dietary supplements; Gelatine for use in manufacturing food products, dietary supplements, and confectioneryACTIVE—
005Dietary supplements in the form of gummies; nutraceutical preparations, namely, gummy vitamin and nutritional supplementsACTIVE—
030Confectionery made of sugar; gummies being gummy candies; sweetsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 1, 2026GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 1, 2026CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 1, 2026XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 1, 2026GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 1, 2026CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 1, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 30, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 30, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 3, 2026RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 18, 2026RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 17, 2026RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 16, 2026RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 15, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 9, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 3, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 3, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 2, 2026REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance