USPTO serial 79447202
EST. 1992 ZOLOTYI VIK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 661
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GANDARA, KEYLA MARIA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 121
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EST. 1992 ZOLOTYI VIK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott Woodbury
Scott Woodbury S Woodbury IP PLLC1363 N 200 WCenterville, UT 84014United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Glazes for food; dragees being non-medicated confectionery; chocolate-glazed almonds; caramel glaze; confectionery made of sugar and chocolate; peanut butter cookies; sesame seeds for use as seasonings; halvah; halva; chocolate-glazed walnuts; vanilla flavorings for culinary purposes; sweet chocolate glazes; chocolate glaze; sugared peanuts in the nature of candy containing peanuts; peanut confectionery; chocolate-coated raisins; chocolate snack bars containing walnuts; cocoa products in the nature of cocoa spreads, mixes, powder, nibs, and tea. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 24, 2026 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 9, 2026 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 9, 2026 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 26, 2026 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 25, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 3, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 2, 2026 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |