Drawing for BEYERDYNAMIC HEADPHONE LAB

USPTO serial 79447251

BEYERDYNAMIC HEADPHONE LAB

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 641Office Action
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JOINER, KATINA JACKSON
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104

What this means

The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.

Status 641: Status 641 means the USPTO mailed a non-final Office Action identifying issues with your application. You typically have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Need help with BEYERDYNAMIC HEADPHONE LAB?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable software for controlling, setting, operating and monitoring analog and digital audio devices, in particular headphones and headset systems; downloadable software to improve noise cancellation in headphones; downloadable software to improve the sound of headphones; downloadable software for binaural playback of sound signals on headphones; downloadable software for immersive audio playback on headphones; downloadable software for 3d audio playback on headphones; downloadable software for downloading, transmitting, receiving, editing, extracting, encoding, decoding, playing, storing and organizing audio and video data; downloadable software for wireless data transfer between connected accessories and data processing devices, in particular computers and tablet computers; downloadable software for wireless data transfer between connected accessories and communication equipment, especially smartphones; downloadable software for controlling sound playback devices, especially headphones; downloadable software for playback of audio and video signals.ACTIVE—
042Software-as-a-service [SaaS] for controlling, setting, operating and monitoring analog and digital audio devices, in particular headphones and headset systems; software-as-a-service [SaaS] to improve noise cancellation in headphones; software-as-a-service [SaaS] to improve the sound of headphones; software-as-a-service [SaaS] for binaural playback of sound signals on headphones; software-as-a-service [SaaS] for immersive audio playback on headphones; software-as-a-service [SaaS] for 3D audio playback on headphones; software-as-a-service [SaaS] for downloading, transmitting, receiving, editing, extracting, encoding, decoding, playing, storing and organizing audio and video data; software-as-a-service [SaaS] for wireless data transmission between connected accessories and data processing devices, in particular computers and tablet computers; software-as-a-service [SaaS] for wireless data transmission between connected accessories and communication equipment, especially smartphones; software-as-a-service [SaaS] for controlling sound playback devices; software-as-a-service [SaaS] for the playback of audio and video signals.ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 3, 2026RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 17, 2026RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 17, 2026RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 2, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 2, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 13, 2026RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 12, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 11, 2026RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW—
Jun 11, 2026RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 10, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 9, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 3, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 3, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 2, 2026REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance