Drawing for CLEANUP DERMA

USPTO serial 79447780

CLEANUP DERMA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 681
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CLEANUP DERMA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Hoejae Ryu

Hoejae Ryu NKL Law3251 Blenheim BlvdSuite 500Fairfax, VA 22030

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Cosmetics; moisturizing skin creams, lotions and gels; cosmetic facial packs; serums for cosmetic purposes; skin toners; cosmetic sun block; cosmetic preparations for skin renewal; non-medicated skin care preparations; non-medicated stimulating lotions for the skinACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 14, 2026OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 14, 2026OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 1, 2026CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 17, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 17, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 17, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 17, 2026RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 28, 2026RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 28, 2026RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 29, 2026ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS—
Jul 29, 2026ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 29, 2026REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 29, 2026CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jul 29, 2026COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jun 21, 2026RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 20, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 5, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 10, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 10, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 9, 2026REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance