Drawing for MIYOSMART IQ

USPTO serial 79447842

MIYOSMART IQ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 661
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SEVERSON, JUSTIN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MIYOSMART IQ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jon Jekel

Jon Jekel Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP11682 El Camino Real, Suite 200San Diego, CA 92130United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Spectacles; spectacle lenses; spectacle lens blanks; ophthalmic lenses; spectacle frames; spectacle cases; sunglasses; contact lenses; containers for contact lenses.ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 24, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 24, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 24, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 9, 2026RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 23, 2026RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 23, 2026RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 5, 2026RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 4, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 22, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 19, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 19, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 9, 2026REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance