Drawing for INNISFREE GREEN TEA CERAMIDE MILK

USPTO serial 79448016

INNISFREE GREEN TEA CERAMIDE MILK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 681
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DWYER, JOHN D
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INNISFREE GREEN TEA CERAMIDE MILK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brent E Routman

Brent E Routman Merchant & Gould, P.C.150 South 5th Street, Suite 2200P.O. Box 2910Minneapolis, MN 55402

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Cosmetic preparations for skin care; essences for cosmetic purposes; oils for toiletry purposes; body and beauty care cosmetics; perfumes; cosmetics; room fragrancing preparations; cotton wool for cosmetic purposes; cosmetic preparations for hair care; hair shampoos.ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 8, 2026RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 7, 2026OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 7, 2026OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 24, 2026CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 24, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 23, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 23, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 20, 2026RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 20, 2026RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 27, 2026RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 26, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 24, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 24, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 16, 2026REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance