USPTO serial 79448236
MERCURY.AI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 641Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SEVERSON, JUSTIN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with MERCURY.AI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software based on artificial intelligence for video content analysis in the field of security; software for detecting objects, faces, events, behavior and anomalies in video content; software for managing, processing, storing and distributing video data; video management software (VMS); video surveillance cameras; IP cameras; network cameras; thermal imaging cameras; high-resolution cameras; apparatus for recording, reproducing and processing video images (including NVR and DVR devices); electronic sensors and detectors for security systems; computer hardware and processing units for real-time data analysis; components and peripherals for video management systems. | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Development of software based on artificial intelligence for analysis and interpretation of video content; design, programming, development, updating and maintenance of video management software; development of machine learning algorithms, image analysis, object recognition and anomaly detection; technological advice in the field of video management systems and security technology; research and development in the fields of artificial intelligence, digital image processing and video analytics; design and development of hardware solutions for video management systems. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 2026 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 16, 2026 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 16, 2026 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 13, 2026 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 12, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 23, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 16, 2026 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |