USPTO serial 79448439
UAVO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 661
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AGREDA, SAMANTHA LEIGH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 123
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with UAVO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Corey K. Cho
Corey K. Cho Saliwanchik, Lloyd & Eisenschenk, P.A.3107 SW Williston RdGainesville, FL 32608United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics; skin toners; cosmetic preparations for skin care; skin hydrators for cosmetic purposes; essential oils for cosmetic purposes; serums for cosmetic purposes; sunscreen preparations; make-up; colour cosmetics; tissues impregnated with cosmetics; mask pack for cosmetic purposes; exfoliant cosmetics; skin cleansing creams; body wash; non-medicated soaps for personal use; facial cleansing preparations; hair shampoo; cosmetic preparations for bath and shower; facial scrubs; body creams; perfume; cosmetics for children. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 2, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 24, 2026 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 8, 2026 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 8, 2026 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 25, 2026 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 24, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 27, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 23, 2026 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |