USPTO serial 79448859
VIFON FOR TODAY SINCE 1963 BÁNH PHO BÔNG LÚA VÀNG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 641Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RIBAUDO, MICHELLE RACHEL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 126
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with VIFON FOR TODAY SINCE 1963 BÁNH PHO BÔNG LÚA VÀNG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Szymon M. Gurda
Szymon M. Gurda Cherskov Flaynik & Gurda LLC903 Commerce DrSuite 310Oak Brook, IL 60523Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Instant soup; instant soups; soups and soup preparation ingredients being meat extracts; dried vegetables; soup concentrates; broth concentrates; soup powders; consommes. | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Farinaceous food pastes; pasta and pasta-based meals; rice sticks; alimentary seasonings; seasoning mixes; flavour enhancers (seasonings) for food; pasta sauce. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2026 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 12, 2026 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 12, 2026 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 7, 2026 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 6, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 2026 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2026 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2026 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 30, 2026 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2026 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 30, 2026 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 6, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2026 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |