Drawing for OLIVIER CAZENAVE

USPTO serial 79448921

OLIVIER CAZENAVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 681
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CAHILL, CLARE GALLAGHER
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OLIVIER CAZENAVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey H. Handelsman

Jeffrey H. Handelsman Greenblum & Bernstein, P.L.C.1950 Roland Clarke PlaceReston, VA 20191-1411United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Wines.ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 30, 2026CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 24, 2026RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 15, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 15, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 15, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 15, 2026ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS—
Sep 15, 2026ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 15, 2026REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 15, 2026CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Sep 15, 2026COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Sep 9, 2026RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 9, 2026RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 26, 2026RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 25, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 23, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 1, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
May 1, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 30, 2026REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance