Drawing for DOUBLE LASTING COVER TOK CONCEAL POT

USPTO serial 79449046

DOUBLE LASTING COVER TOK CONCEAL POT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 681
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
REEVES, APRIL ELIZABETH
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DOUBLE LASTING COVER TOK CONCEAL POT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brent E Routman

Brent E Routman Merchant & Gould, P.C.150 South 5th Street, Suite 2200P.O. Box 2910Minneapolis, MN 55402

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Make-up; non-medicated toiletry preparations; body and beauty care cosmetics; perfumes; cosmetics; room fragrancing preparations; cotton wool for cosmetic purposes; cosmetic preparations for hair care; hair shampoosACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 8, 2026RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 2, 2026CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 1, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 1, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 1, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 24, 2026RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 24, 2026RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 13, 2026RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 12, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 28, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 1, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
May 1, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 30, 2026REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance