USPTO serial 79449138
AIRGENTIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 681
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GREENE, JOSEPH A
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AIRGENTIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David L. Oppenhuizen
David L. Oppenhuizen Oppenhuizen Law PLC625 Kenmoor Ave. SESte. 301Grand Rapids, MI 49546Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable web application software for answering website visitor questions from an organization's own content, providing website search, capturing visitor information and transmitting it to customer relationship management systems, transferring conversations to human staff, and analyzing conversations for customer insights; downloadable software using artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning for answering website visitor questions, providing website search, and analyzing conversations for customer insights; downloadable computer software using artificial intelligence and machine learning for simulating conversations and providing customer service; downloadable web application software for information retrieval and search; downloadable web application software for natural language processing; downloadable web application software for chatbot and conversational interfaces | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Cloud computing services, namely, cloud hosting of software for website conversational AI, website search, lead capture, live customer support handoff, and conversation analytics; software as a service (SaaS) featuring software using artificial intelligence and machine learning for answering website visitor questions from an organization's own content, providing website search, capturing visitor information and transmitting it to customer relationship management systems, transferring conversations to human staff, and analyzing conversations for customer insights; software as a service (SaaS) featuring software for information retrieval, search and knowledge management; software as a service (SaaS) featuring software for natural language processing and conversational interfaces; artificial intelligence as a service (AIAAS) featuring software using artificial intelligence for answering website visitor questions, providing website search, simulating conversations, and analyzing conversations for customer insights; software as a service (SaaS) featuring non-downloadable software for temporary use for automating customer service and support tasks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2026 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 22, 2026 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 21, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 11, 2026 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 10, 2026 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 26, 2026 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 25, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 1, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2026 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |