Drawing for LIBERTY ENDOVASCULAR ROBOTIC SYSTEM

USPTO serial 79449384

LIBERTY ENDOVASCULAR ROBOTIC SYSTEM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 641Office Action
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STEINPFAD, SARAH E
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 120

What this means

The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.

Status 641: Status 641 means the USPTO mailed a non-final Office Action identifying issues with your application. You typically have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Need help with LIBERTY ENDOVASCULAR ROBOTIC SYSTEM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010A robotic medical system consisting of medical device, communication means, data storage, controller and medical instruments for automated endovascular procedures (term considered too vague by the International Bureau pursuant to Rule 13 (2) (b) of the Regulations); a robotic medical system consisting of medical device, communication means, controller and medical instruments for automated endovascular procedures (term considered too vague by the International Bureau pursuant to Rule 13 (2) (b) of the Regulations); a robotic medical system consisting of medical device, communication means, data storage, controller and medical instruments for advancing and navigating of medical instruments in endovascular medical procedures (term considered too vague by the International Bureau pursuant to Rule 13 (2) (b) of the Regulations); a robotic medical system consisting of medical device, communication means, controller and medical instruments for advancing and navigating of medical instruments in endovascular medical procedures (term considered too vague by the International Bureau pursuant to Rule 13 (2) (b) of the Regulations); a robotic medical system consisting of medical device, communication means, data storage, controller and medical instruments for advancement, navigation and placement of guide wires and/or catheters in endovascular medical procedures (term considered too vague by the International Bureau pursuant to Rule 13 (2) (b) of the Regulations); a robotic medical system consisting of medical device, communication means, controller and medical instruments for advancement, navigation and placement of guide wires and/or catheters in endovascular medical procedures (term considered too vague by the International Bureau pursuant to Rule 13 (2) (b) of the Regulations); a robotic medical system consisting of medical device, communication means, data storage, con troller and medical instruments for advancement, navigation and placement of guide wires and/or catheters in endovascular procedures, namely, coronary, peripheral and cerebral endovascular procedures (term considered too vague by the International Bureau pursuant to Rule 13 (2) (b) of the Regulations); robotically controlled drive mechanism for use in endovascular medical procedures (term considered too vague by the International Bureau pursuant to Rule 13 (2) (b) of the Regulations); a medical device, namely, a remote manipulation system consisting of a robotic device, to facilitate remote advancement, navigation and placement of medical instruments in endovascular medical procedures (term considered too vague by the International Bureau pursuant to Rule 13 (2) (b) of the Regulations); a medical device, namely, a tele-robotic system consisting of a motorized advancement and navigation device having rotational and translational movement capabilities to facilitate remote advancement, navigation and placement of medical instruments, namely, guide wires and/or catheters (term considered too vague by the International Bureau pursuant to Rule 13 (2) (b) of the Regulations); bedside robotic medical system consisting of medical device, communication means, data storage, controller and medical instruments for advancement, navigation and placement of medical instruments in endovascular medical procedures (term considered too vague by the International Bureau pursuant to Rule 13 (2) (b) of the Regulations); bedside robotic medical system consisting of medical device, communication means, controller and medical instruments for advancement, navigation and placement of medical instruments in endovascular medical procedures (term considered too vague by the International Bureau pursuant to Rule 13 (2) (b) of the Regulations); body-mountable robotic medical system consisting of medical device, communication means, data storage, controller and medical instruments for advancement, navigation and placement of medical instruments in endovascular medical procedures (term considered too vague by the International Bureau pursuant to Rule 13 (2) (b) of the Regulations); body-mountable robotic medical system consisting of medical device, communication means, controller and medical instruments for advancement, navigation and placement of medical instruments in endovascular medical procedures (term considered too vague by the International Bureau pursuant to Rule 13 (2) (b) of the Regulations).ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 17, 2026RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 30, 2026RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 30, 2026RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 23, 2026RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 22, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 9, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 8, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
May 8, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 7, 2026REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance