Drawing for TEAM 17

USPTO serial 79449387

TEAM 17

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 661
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STEINPFAD, SARAH E
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 120

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TEAM 17?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lynn M. Jordan

Lynn M. Jordan Kelly IP, LLP1150 Connecticut Avenue NW, Suite 600Washington, DC 20036United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Entertainment services in the nature of video games; entertainment services, namely, providing online computer and video games; entertainment services, namely, providing temporary use of non-downloadable video games; entertainment services, namely, provision of online non-downloadable computer games to be accessed via the Internet, browser, consoles, computers, mobile telephones, tables and or other wireless devices; entertainment services, namely, providing electronic games services provided by means of the Internet providing multi-player services; online interactive entertainment, namely, providing online computer games; electronic game services provided by means of the internet; electronic video game services provided by means of the internet; on-line gaming services in the nature of providing online computer games; electronic games services provided by means of the Internet; online gaming services in the nature of computer games; multimedia publishing of interactive computer and video game software; multimedia publishing relating to video game software; organising of electronic game competitions; information, advisory and consultancy services relating to the aforesaidACTIVE—
042Design and development of video and computer game software; design and development of mobile applications; design and development of video game software; design and development of computer game software; development of computer game programs and software; computer programming and software design in relation to video, electronic and online games; graphic design in relation to video, electronic, and online games; computer programming services for creating augmented reality videos and games; updating computer games programs; updating video games programs; provision of technical support, namely, troubleshooting of computer software problems in the field of computer games software; software as a service (SaaS) featuring software for playing computer, video and electronic online games; software as a service (SaaS) featuring software platforms for playing electronic video games; information, advisory and consultancy services relating to the aforesaid servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 5, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 5, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 5, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 23, 2026RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 5, 2026RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 5, 2026RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 19, 2026RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 18, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 9, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 8, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
May 8, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 7, 2026REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance