USPTO serial 79449610
KRONSTEYN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 661
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AGREDA, SAMANTHA LEIGH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 123
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KRONSTEYN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David L. Oppenhuizen
David L. Oppenhuizen Oppenhuizen Law PLC625 Kenmoor Ave. SESte. 301Grand Rapids, MI 49546Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 045 | Legal advice; legal services, namely, legal advice and representation; legal advice relating to franchising; legal consultation in the field of taxation; legal consultancy relating to intellectual property rights; legal advisory services relating to consumers rights[ legal advice] ; trademark watch services for legal advisory purposes; professional legal consultations relating to franchising; legal consultancy relating to patent mapping; monitoring intellectual property rights for legal advisory purposes; barrister services in the nature of legal services; solicitors' services in the nature of legal services; legal document preparation services; chaperoning; intellectual property consultancy; legal services, namely, legal advocacy services; legal services in relation to the negotiation of contracts for others; legal administration of licences; legal watching services in the field of patents, trademarks, and copyrights; mediation being legal services; legal mediation services; legal services, namely, mediation in legal procedures; arbitration, mediation being legal services and dispute resolution services; legal compliance auditing; regulatory compliance auditing; legal advice in responding to calls for tenders; legal research; personal letter writing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 8, 2026 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 24, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 21, 2026 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 21, 2026 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 17, 2026 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 16, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 13, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2026 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |