USPTO serial 79449736
MICADELVA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 681
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHEN, DANIEL HOWE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MICADELVA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Salvatore Anthony Sidoti
Salvatore Anthony Sidoti Curatolo Sidoti & Trillis III Co., LPA24500 Center Ridge RoadSuite 280Cleveland, OH 44145Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemicals used in industry and science; chemical preparations for use in photography; synthetic aromas being chemicals for use in manufacture; aromas being chemicals for use in manufacture; aromatic compounds being chemicals for use in manufacture; aromatic compounds, aromas and fragrances being chemical fragrancing compounds for industrial purposes. | ACTIVE | — |
| 003 | Fragrances. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2026 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 3, 2026 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 26, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 14, 2026 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 14, 2026 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 12, 2026 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 11, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 8, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2026 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |