USPTO serial 79450176
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paulo A. de Almeida
Paulo A. de Almeida Wolf, Rifkin, Shapiro, Schulman & Rabkin11400 W. Olympic Blvd., 9th Fl.Los Angeles, CA 90064United States| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Protection devices being nets for personal use against accidents; clothing for protection against accidents; gloves for protection against accidents; insulating gloves for protection against accidents; shoes for protection against accident or injury; acid proof gloves for protection against accidents; protective goggles for sports; reflective safety vests; protective helmets; underwater breathing apparatus, not for medical purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Watering devices being non-electric water spraying mops; cleaning brushes for household use; natural sea sponges for bathing; gloves for household purposes; gardening gloves; oven mitts; dusting gloves; cotton gloves for household purposes; rubber gloves for household purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, shirts, pants, skirts; hats; hosiery; ski gloves; mittens; mountaineering gloves; driving gloves; raincoats; overalls; shoes | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 3, 2026 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 16, 2026 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 15, 2026 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 13, 2026 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 12, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 20, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2026 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |