Drawing for FLEXDRIVE

USPTO serial 79450319

FLEXDRIVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 661
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
O'BRIEN, JENNIFER LYNN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 121

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FLEXDRIVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen J. Pachol

Stephen J. Pachol Nixon & Vanderhye, P.C.901 N. Glebe Rd.11th FloorArlington, VA 22203

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Dental apparatus and instruments, namely, flexible holders for dental implant drivers, flexible holders for dental prosthetic screwdrivers, dental implant drivers, dental prosthetic screwdrivers, and cases fitted for dental instruments; flexible couplings being structural parts of dental instruments.ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 17, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 17, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 17, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 3, 2026RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 15, 2026RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 15, 2026RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 14, 2026RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 13, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 6, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 5, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jun 5, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 21, 2026REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance