Drawing for ECHTOP

USPTO serial 79450481

ECHTOP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 681
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CROWDER-SCHAEFER, ANDREW W
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ECHTOP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Hui Zhang

Hui Zhang RABIN & BERDO, P.C.8150 Leesburg Pike, Suite 800Vienna, VA 22182United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Dynamos; engines, other than for land vehicles; engine pistons; motors and engine starters; water pumps for use in motors and engines; electrical generator groups, namely, electrical generators; pumps as parts of machines, engines, and motors; pumps for machines; driving motors, other than for land vehiclesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 7, 2026OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 7, 2026OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 25, 2026CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 24, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 24, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 24, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 27, 2026RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 10, 2026RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 10, 2026RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 10, 2026RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 9, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 3, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 2, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jun 2, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 21, 2026REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance