Drawing for PEAK RAILING DESIGNER

USPTO serial 79450505

PEAK RAILING DESIGNER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 681
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TRUSILO, KELLY JEAN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PEAK RAILING DESIGNER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Melissa LaBauve

Melissa LaBauve Pirkey Barber PLLC1801 East 6th Street, Suite 300Austin, TX 78702United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Metal railings; metal railing systems comprising metal railings, posts, pickets, spacers, brackets, gates; parts and fittings for all the aforesaid goodsACTIVE—
019Glass panels for use with railing systemsACTIVE—
042Software as a services (SAAS) services featuring software allowing the user to design and plan decks and to choose railings and accessories necessary for building the decksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 24, 2026RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 20, 2026CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 18, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 18, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 18, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 8, 2026RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 8, 2026RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 25, 2026RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 24, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 22, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 2, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jun 2, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 21, 2026REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance