Drawing for WINGELLO

USPTO serial 79451399

WINGELLO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 661
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MARTYNOV,VIKTORIIA V
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 133

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WINGELLO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Patrick Jennings

Patrick Jennings Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman, LLP1200 Seventeenth Street, NWWashington, DC 20036United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Pest control preparations and articles, namely, insect repellents; biocides; agricultural and domestic biopesticides; algicides for agricultural use; fungicides; bacterial poisons; insecticides; herbicides; antiparasitic preparations from chemical sources; chemicals for forestry, namely, parasiticides; larvicides being parasiticides; preparations for controlling insects being insecticides; preparations for destroying noxious animals; nematicides; ovicides; rodenticides; vermin destroying preparations; sporicides; vermicides; weedicides being weed killersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 24, 2026RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 16, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 16, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 16, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 9, 2026RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 9, 2026RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 1, 2026RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 30, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 24, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 12, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jun 12, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 11, 2026REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance