USPTO serial 79451437
DUCO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 661
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CANTOR, JILLIAN REDDING
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 137
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DUCO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher M. Turk
Christopher M. Turk The Belles Group P.C.Suite 10101800 John F Kennedy Blvd.Philadelphia, PA 19103Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Tobacco processing machines; coffee grinders, other than hand-operated; industrial robots; Material automatic handling machines, namely, manipulators for forging presses and for forging machines; Machines for sorting fruit for industrial use; Machines for sorting recyclable materials for industrial use; Machines for sorting machine parts for industrial use; Sorting machines for chemical processing for industrial use | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 24, 2026 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 9, 2026 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 9, 2026 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 25, 2026 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 24, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 23, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2026 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 11, 2026 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |