Drawing for MILVUS ROBOTICS

USPTO serial 79451456

MILVUS ROBOTICS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 641Office Action
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HUSSAIN, TASNEEM
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 118

What this means

The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.

Status 641: Status 641 means the USPTO mailed a non-final Office Action identifying issues with your application. You typically have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Need help with MILVUS ROBOTICS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Robots used for product handling and sorting in storage, production, e-commerce, and logistics processes (term considered too vague by the International Bureau pursuant to Rule 13 (2) (b) of the Regulations); platform and fork-type robots used in transport tasks (term considered too vague by the International Bureau pursuant to Rule 13 (2) (b) of the Regulations); mechanisms that enable load handling using gravity, weight, and balance (term considered too vague by the International Bureau pursuant to Rule 13 (2) (b) of the Regulations); lifts, karakuri systems, conveyors, pin-hook attachments (term considered too vague by the International Bureau pursuant to Rule 13 (2) (b) of the Regulations); autonomous mobile robots used for transporting liquid products and equipped with protective systems to prevent spillage (term considered too vague by the International Bureau pursuant to Rule 13 (2) (b) of the Regulations).ACTIVE—
009Software for route planning, traffic task management, simulation, and navigation; software for product-handling robots in storage, e-commerce, and internal logistics processes, as well as software for sorting robots; wireless charging stations and automatic charging stations.ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 10, 2026RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 25, 2026RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 25, 2026RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 18, 2026RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 17, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 16, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 15, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jun 15, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 11, 2026REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance