Drawing for MT HELMETS

USPTO serial 79451882

MT HELMETS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 641Office Action
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MACKO, CINDY JOYCE SAVITR
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104

What this means

The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.

Status 641: Status 641 means the USPTO mailed a non-final Office Action identifying issues with your application. You typically have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Need help with MT HELMETS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey H. Handelsman

Jeffrey H. Handelsman Greenblum & Bernstein, P.L.C.1950 Roland Clarke PlaceReston, VA 20191-1411United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Safety helmets; protective helmets for sports; headgear being protective helmets; protective helmets for sports; protective helmets for children; protective face-shields for protective helmets; protective clothing for preventing injuries; protective clothing [body armor]; safety gloves for protection against accident or injury; protective goggles; visors for helmets; protective visors; boots [protective footwear]; protective helmets for motorists; motorcycling goggles; protective clothing against accidents or injuries for motorcyclists; helmet camera; protective helmets.ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 26, 2026RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 25, 2026RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 22, 2026RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 21, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 21, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 30, 2026ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS—
Jun 30, 2026ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 30, 2026REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 30, 2026CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jun 30, 2026COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jun 12, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jun 12, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 11, 2026REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance